BI-Pal advisory board members convened around a conference table
Study day at the AAU with International Academic Teams — June 2024
Panelists on stage at the "Why It Worked" adaptive leadership event
Study day at the AAU with International Academic Teams — June 2024
BI-Pal team members standing together outdoors
Meetings at the Mitchell Institute at Queen's University in Belfast — June 2025
Overview

Towards an evidence-based conflict resolution framework for a just and agreed upon solution to the Palestinian issue

Bridging Insights Palestine (BI-Pal) builds the ecosystem, network, and evidence base needed to enable a political process for the Palestinian issue grounded in dignity, freedom, equality, justice, and self-determination.

Scroll
What we are achieving

Building the ecosystem for a just, agreed-upon solution

BI-Pal takes the first critical steps toward a political process for the Palestinian issue — built on a shared evidence base, a broad network, and a common set of values.

Building the ecosystem

BI-Pal seeks to take the first critical steps in building the ecosystem that addresses the Palestinian context.

Mobilizing diverse leaders

BI-Pal seeks to identify, engage and mobilize a significant network of diverse leaders.

Enabling a political process

BI-Pal aims to contribute to the enabling of a political process towards a solution based on core values of dignity, freedom, equality, justice and self-determination.

Solving real challenges

BI-Pal aims to find solutions to problems and challenges related to the context.

01
Building the ecosystem
02
Mobilizing diverse leaders
03
Enabling a political process
04
Solving real challenges
Strategic pillars

A theory-and-practice methodology

Adopting a "theory and practice" methodology, BI-Pal works through two interdependent strategic pillars.

PILLAR 01

The Evidence-Based Research Program

Learning the insights of a comparative analysis study (Why It Worked) of areas of conflict, devised and funded by Bridging Insights, Inc. and designed and led by Harvard Kennedy School's Negotiation and Conflict Resolution Collaboratory, to understand the factors that helped parties in conflict areas engage in a political process — then applying a contextualized toolkit based on that evidence to diagnose gaps and challenges and allow for interventions.

PILLAR 02

The Engagement, Outreach and Collaboration Program

Engaging the Palestinian community through both top-down and bottom-up methods, creating safe spaces where pluralism is harnessed for constructive change, and including the perspectives and insights of relevant partners and stakeholders.

Our approach

Five steps, grounded in evidence

Each step builds on the last — from studying what has worked elsewhere to creating space for change at home.

01

A comparative analysis study (Why It Worked) of areas of conflict, to identify factors that help in conflict resolution.

02

Applying evidence based and a contextualized toolkit for conflict resolution from WIW

03

Engaging the Palestinian community through both top-down and bottom-up methods.

04

Creating safe spaces where pluralism is harnessed for constructive change.

05

Including the perspectives and insights of relevant partners and stakeholders.

Values

What guides the work

Pluralism Justice Participation Integrity Innovation
Why this matters

Why this matters

"Creating hope." that's why it matters
What we do

Turning insight into action

BI-Pal works through its two pillars to generate knowledge and identify and engage the relevant stakeholders.

In practice, that means focusing on advancing young leaders, strengthening internal cohesion, endorsing a culture of dialogue, acceptance of the other, rebuilding trust, protecting civic space, and creating inclusive forms of community participation.

Fatina speaking at a BI-Pal activity
BI-Pal activities in the field
Academics and practitioners collaborating with BI-Pal
Building a cross-sector network
Who we work with

A broad, cross-sector network

Through a top-down and bottom-up approach, BI-Pal engages with academics, practitioners, civil society organizations, academic institutions, research centers, and youth networks.

Academics Practitioners Civil Society Organizations Academic Institutions Research Centers Youth Networks